Transmission and Reformulation of a Concept. Semio-Critical Study of Tensivity

Authors

  • Sémir Badir University of Liege

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35494/topsem.2021.2.46.739

Keywords:

Reformulation, Transmission, Tensivity

Abstract

Claude Zilberberg made clear of his intellectual indebtedness to Hjelmslev. That implies, firstly, that he has his own thinking, secondly, that he is helped to shape it by someone else, in this case Hjelmslev (among other writers) and, thirdly, that he might have transmitted some of the Hjelmslev’s concepts in his texts. The first two presumptions are self-evident but what about the third? The hypothesis that we would like to develop in this study is that this transmission supposes a specific discursive gesture, namely a reformulation, and adds an enunciative value to the statement. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sémir Badir, University of Liege

Professor and Researcher

References

Badir, S. (2009). Zilberberg – Hjelmslev : aller – retour. En D. Ablali et S. Badir (Dir.). Analytiques du sensible. Pour
Claude Zilberberg (pp. 207-223). Limoges. Lambert-Lucas.

Biglari, A. (Éd.). (2014). Entretiens Sémiotiques. Limoges. Lambert-Lucas.

Cigana, L. (2014). La nozione di « partecipazione » nella Glossematica di Louis Hjelmslev. (Tesis de doctorado).
Universidad de Lieja; Universidad de Calabria. https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/159695

Croft, W. (2013). Language Use and the Evolution of Languages. En P.-M. Binder & K. Smith (Eds.). The Language
Phenomenon. Berlín. Springer, 93-120.

Greimas, A. J. (1970). Du sens. París. Seuil.

Greimas, A. J. (1986). Conversation. Versus, (43), 41-57.

Greimas, A. J. ; et Landowski, E. et al. (1979). Introduction à l’analyse du discours en sciences sociales. París.
Hachette.

Hjelmslev, L. (1971). Prolégomènes à une théorie du Langage. París. Minuit.

Hjelmslev, L. (1973). Essais linguistiques II. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague, XIV. Copenhague.
Nordisk Sprog-og Kulturforlag.

Hjelmslev, L. (1985). Nouveaux essais. París. PUF.

Zilberberg, C. (1981). Essai sur les modalités tensives. Ámsterdam. Benjamins.

Zilberberg, C. (1985). Connaissance de Hjelmslev (Prague ou Copenhague?). En C. Caputo et R. Gallasi (Éd.).
Louis Hjelmslev, Linguistica, Semiotica, Epistemologia. Il Protagora, XXV(7-8), 127-168.

Zilberberg, C. (1986a). Le ‘Mémoire’ de Saussure lu par Hjelmslev. Versus, 43, 59-90.

Zilberberg, C. (1986b). À propos de l’édition française des “Nouveaux essais” de Louis Hjelmslev. Versus, 43, 29-
140.

Zilberberg, C. (1987). Relation et rationalité. Actualité de Brøndal. Langages, (86), 59-77.

Zilberberg, C. (1988). Raison et poétique du sens. París. PUF.

Zilberberg, C. (1997). Une continuité incertaine : Saussure, Hjelmslev, Greimas. En A. Zinna (Éd.). Hjelmslev
aujourd’hui (pp. 165-192). Turnhout. Brepols.

Zilberberg, C. (2001). Forme, fonction affect. Janus, (2). En R. Galassi y M. de Michel (Éds.). Louis Hjelmslev a
cent’anni dalla nascita. Padua. Imprimitur, 79-100.

Zilberberg, C. (2006). Éléments de grammaire tensive. Limoges. Pulim.

Zilberberg, C. (2011). Des formes de vie aux valeurs. París. PUF.

Zilberberg, C. (2012). La structure tensive. Lieja. PUL.

Published

2021-06-25

How to Cite

Badir, S. (2021). Transmission and Reformulation of a Concept. Semio-Critical Study of Tensivity. Tópicos Del Seminario, 2(46), 80–100. https://doi.org/10.35494/topsem.2021.2.46.739